p.s. do u suddenly dont like anime anymore? or do you have toooooo much of it??

In terms of movies, Erin Hunter has spoken with moive directors, and right now, there are no plans. As she said in August 2009:
"Oh, the fickle world of movie making, well, there are currently no Warriors movies in production or even under consideration. The economy is not in a state to invest in a rather dark animation about feral cats, apparently. I promise I’ll let you know if there are any changes"

So that indicates, of course, that it is going to be an animation, if it is made. Personally, I’;d love to see a Warriors movie… In fact, I want to write the soundtrack!!!

Hope I helped (in between all my side comments)

It would be a mistake to take this “sequencing” argument too far. On the fiscal side, it will be difficult politically to actively tighten policy, i.e., raise taxes or cut spending at a time when the unemployment rate is around 10%. On the balance sheet side, only a minority of Fed officials seem to favor outright asset sales. Others worry, in our view correctly, that it may be difficult to calibrate the effects of such sales on financial conditions and would prefer hikes in the funds rate to precede outright asset sales.

But a softer version of the sequencing argument may still apply. Even if there is no turn to active restraint via tax hikes, spending cuts, or asset sales, it is highly likely that there will be some passive restraint. Exhibit 2 shows that we expect fiscal policy to turn from stimulus by late 2010 or early 2011. Moreover, the asset purchase program is likely to be completed in the first quarter of 2010, and this might lead to a tightening of financial conditions if the “flow” of purchases matters for either the level of long-term yields or the valuation of other assets. The larger these passive restraints, the further away is the point at which Fed officials will need to turn to federal funds rate hikes to in order to fend off inflationary pressures